.... I think Saturday's game against Mo State is huge.
UH, we are 6-13 in our last 19 games.
Those 6 wins were against Michigan (2011), at Purdue (2011), NIU (2012), UNI (2012), Minnesota (2012) and at MSU (2012).
Those 13 losses were against one of the worst Minnesota teams ever (2011), blown out by MSU (2011), at Debbie (2011), Oklahoma (2011), ISU at Kinnick (2012), Central Michigan (2012), blown out by PSU (2012), At Northwestern (2012), at Indiana (2012), Purdue at Kinnick (2012), blown out at Michigan (2012), Nebraska (2012).
1999 - 0-8
2000 - 3-5
2001 - 4-4
2002 - 8-0
2003 - 5-3
2004 - 7-1
2005 - 5-3
2006 - 2-6
2007 - 4-4 (with no OSU and Michigan)
2008 - 5-3
2009 - 6-2
2010 - 4-4
2011 - 4-4
2012 - 2-6
2013 - 2-6 consensus predictions
We were paying Hayden close to $200K in his last year, and he finished 98-61-5 in the Big Ten.
We are paying Ferentz $3.65 million/year, and he's currently 100-75 in the Big Ten.
You have to remember how horrible Iowa football was before Fry arrived.
Looking back, that 1999 team was exactly "cupboard bare".
Looking back, that Penn State game in 2008 changed the course, for the better, for a few years.
Looking back, that Wisconsin game in 2010 has changed the course for a few years, and we are still on that course.
Hayden was a salesman of Iowa football. Hayden has some lean teams, a la 92-94, but would create optimism.
With the NIU game tied at 27-27, I would have much more trust in Hayden's play calling than what we saw with Greg Davis and that out pattern.
People like coaches, like Bret Bielema, because they are constantly selling the program.
We see someone, in Kirk, who rarely is on sports radio, selling Iowa football.
Hayden hasn't coached in 15 years, but I bet that more people nationwide, when you ask them about Iowa football, Hayden Fry would be the top answer.
The 2010 Northwestern game did more damage than the 2010 Wisky game. The very next week after the Wisky game Iowa pounded MSU for their only loss of the year and was still very much alive for a B1G title.
Hawks escaped the next week at Indiana and then blow it in Evanston. Pryor's 4th and 10 scramble beats the Hawks in Kinnick and then the wheels completely fall off in Minneapolis.
Besides the fact that this board is littered with a bunch of morans.
NIU is probably the best team Iowa plays until going to Columbus. I would give them the edge over both MSU and Minny.
The offense looked better Saturday then it did at any point last year. And that is with a new QB and some new faces at WR getting major snaps.
It appears we have a legit deep threat at WR and I would bet his playing time will significantly increases as we progress towards the B1G season. Remember, he hasnt even been with the team for a month.
The running game was great and I was really impressed with Blythe.
If this team isnt 4-2 going to OSU in October I will be shocked. I think they will be 5-1.
We threw 37 times against a team that has a small D-line.Rudock won't be asked to do much against ISU as we should just pound it all game long. Destroy them where they are weakest, which is the front 7.
Even though I predicted this loss, I think I know why folks are so ticked off even though all of us saw improvement on Saturday........
1. First home opener loss in 10 years I think.
2. Same old kf trends repeating themselves.
3. Getting a lead and then letting up.
4. Finding a way to lose the close ones.
5. Stupid offensive play calls.
6. Another team runs a fake punt and has great success with it.
7. Overall lack of aggressiveness from the top.
8. Iowa had 200 yards rushing with a 100 yard performer and still lost.
9. Faced a team that lost a lot on their D and still could not pound and pound, or the coaches would not allow that.
10. No pass rush.
11. A very, very bad secondary.
12. With all the talk of outstanding tight ends, they were rarely targeted through out the day.
I am with you to a certain degree in that I think they win their next three straight. Not sure about beating minnie at this point, though.
FreedComanche
How is it letting up or not being agressibe when they continued to throw it when they could have just played it safe and ran the ball? You think throwing it deep on third and one is not being aggressive? That was the definition of agressive. Jake was also airing it out on the other interception as well.
Rudock threw for more yards in his first start than JVB had in a game all of last year. The offense also put up more yards than any game last year. They had more yards at half then they did in most games last year. There is definite improvement and Rudock will only get better with more experience. The line played great. The defense played great against the run. The faster Powell can master the offense the better. That kid is crazy fast.
I shouldn't have to explain this to anybody that knows football, but I'll do it again. The scenario: It's 3rd an 1, 2nd half, you have the lead, your O-Line has a 40 pound per man advantage vs their D-Line, their D is tired, IOWA NEEDS THIS FIRST DOWN, and you run a deep pass play with no intention of going for it on 4th down if the pass play doesn't work. That is not be aggressive, that's being foolish. If still don't understand why this is dumb, you can either listen to Jon Miler's podcast where he says the same thing or.......................well, I can't help you.
MORANS.... I just LOVE it! Keep drinking the Kool Aid you MORON! This team will go 4-8 if they are lucky, I am sticking with 2-10... 5-1 midseason!?!? Ha ha ha ha ha!!! Are you DRUNK!? No, your a MORAN!
![]()
Well the play was there for the taking so it really wasn't a bad call. They didn't execute it was all. If he completed the pass people would be talking about the great call and how they loved how agressive we were. There is no guarantee that they get a first running either in fact I'm pretty sure they were expecting it. Hence the play call and why I don't have a problem with it. I think with more experience or maybe more time working with Powell that I a TD and the earlier long pass to Powell would have been a TD as well. the D couldn't have been too tired I believe they had a couple three and outs in the 4th.
I shouldn't have to explain this to anybody that knows football, but I'll do it again. The scenario: It's 3rd an 1, 2nd half, you have the lead, your O-Line has a 40 pound per man advantage vs their D-Line, their D is tired, IOWA NEEDS THIS FIRST DOWN, and you run a deep pass play with no intention of going for it on 4th down if the pass play doesn't work. That is not be aggressive, that's being foolish. If still don't understand why this is dumb, you can either listen to Jon Miler's podcast where he says the same thing or.......................well, I can't help you.
Well the play was there for the taking so it really wasn't a bad call. They didn't execute it was all. If he completed the pass people would be talking about the great call and how they loved how agressive we were. There is no guarantee that they get a first running either in fact I'm pretty sure they were expecting it. Hence the play call and why I don't have a problem with it. I think with more experience or maybe more time working with Powell that I a TD and the earlier long pass to Powell would have been a TD as well. the D couldn't have been too tired I believe they had a couple three and outs in the 4th.