Hyde Pleads Guilty To Interference Charge

Hyde Pleads Guilty to Interference Charge | KCRG-TV9 | Cedar Rapids, Iowa News, Sports, and Weather | Local News

From article:

IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Iowa cornerback Micah Hyde pleaded guilty to interference with official acts and not guilty to public intoxication stemming from a weekend arrest in downtown Iowa City.

Hyde will pay $397.50 in fine and surcharges on his guilty plea. A bench trial is scheduled 9 a.m. Dec. 27 for his public intoxication charge
If we make a bowl this could be a problem.

Assuming that
A. He's still on the team
B. We make a bowl.

If that happened the court date will be pushed back right?
 
Last edited:
"But offfffficer..... It wazznt MY fault! I wuzz FERCED to sip that spiked ale!" Way to man up my fine lad!
homerdrunk.jpg
 
This is 1 incident, not 2. His punishment has already been handed out, there wont be one because this is still part of his 1st strike.
 
Originally Posted by HawkeyeHypnosis
Hyde Pleads Guilty to Interference Charge | KCRG-TV9 | Cedar Rapids, Iowa News, Sports, and Weather | Local News


From article:


IOWA CITY, Iowa -- Iowa cornerback Micah Hyde pleaded guilty to interference with official acts and not guilty to public intoxication stemming from a weekend arrest in downtown Iowa City.


Hyde will pay $397.50 in fine and surcharges on his guilty plea. A bench trial is scheduled 9 a.m. Dec. 27 for his public intoxication charge
If we make a bowl this could be a problem.


Assuming that
A. He's still on the team
B. We make a bowl.


If that happened the court date will be pushed back right?"
It won't be a problem. If he doesn't show up to the court date he just pays the fine and it's like a guilty charge.
 
Last edited:
Rose Bowl is after Dec 27 and he doesn't need practice anyway. Nobody can stop Kirk after big wins over Gophers and UNI.
 
Hmmmmm. No need interfere with official acts if one isn't guilty of something else. It's just an add on charge to be negotiated and dropped later for a guilty plea of other charge. Hope he doesn't get found guilty and get jail time (I know would be extreme, but it could happen, maybe the judge is an ISU grad and fan) especially when Iowa makes a bowl game. Why not just plead guilty and get it over with? He was obviously drunk or he would have taken the brethalyzer.
 
Hmmmmm. No need interfere with official acts if one isn't guilty of something else. It's just an add on charge to be negotiated and dropped later for a guilty plea of other charge. Hope he doesn't get found guilty and get jail time (I know would be extreme, but it could happen, maybe the judge is an ISU grad and fan) especially when Iowa makes a bowl game. Why not just plead guilty and get it over with? He was obviously drunk or he would have taken the brethalyzer.

Problem is the Iowa City courts are a giant pain in the *** and don't take this kind of BS lightly.
 
Hmmmmm. No need interfere with official acts if one isn't guilty of something else. It's just an add on charge to be negotiated and dropped later for a guilty plea of other charge. Hope he doesn't get found guilty and get jail time (I know would be extreme, but it could happen, maybe the judge is an ISU grad and fan) especially when Iowa makes a bowl game. Why not just plead guilty and get it over with? He was obviously drunk or he would have taken the brethalyzer.

He reportedly had had only three drinks. IWOA can get slapped on for anything. That doesn't make him guilty of the public intox. You can interfere during the course of an arrest for a crime you are not guilty of just as easily as you can when you are guilty.

And if I were confident that I'm not drunk, I wouldn't take a breathalyzer, either. It's no different than not allowing cops to search your car, even if you know they wouldn't find anything of interest, anyway.

I'm not saying he was or wasn't intoxicated. But that IWOA and refusal of a breathalyzer are in no way proof that he was (circumstantial at the VERY best, and even then it's a reach).
 


Top