HawkPhreek
Well-Known Member
Recruit Breakdown ? HawkeyeBeat
Nothing overly new here, but did like Hubbard comments about Iowa people.
Nothing overly new here, but did like Hubbard comments about Iowa people.
Last edited:
Recruiting info
- Thread starter HawkPhreek
- Start date
dmShortSaledude
Well-Known Member
I could probably look this up, but it is late, and I am tired and lazy.
Can Hubbard play the point? Reason I am asking is if we were to get Katenda and Olaseni, then we would have just BC and Marble. If BC goes down, then Marble would be a full-time PG. I'm not too into that idea, although next year he could improve enough to be just that - a full-time PG, he has the skills if developed. One more PG is a must, unless we can find that in Hubbard...
Can Hubbard play the point? Reason I am asking is if we were to get Katenda and Olaseni, then we would have just BC and Marble. If BC goes down, then Marble would be a full-time PG. I'm not too into that idea, although next year he could improve enough to be just that - a full-time PG, he has the skills if developed. One more PG is a must, unless we can find that in Hubbard...
storminspank
Justin VanLaere
Hubbard is not a PG, he's a guy that scores and is good with the ball, but I would not call him a PG. Iowa could really, really use Stokes or Carter at the PG spot. If Iowa got a PG, Hubbard, and one of the big from Kansas, they would be looking really good w. this class. You could use Hubbard to spell BC, but we saw how that went with Marble last year. It would be better for Iowa to get a PG, plus Hubbard if he committed. PG + Big are key, then another at any other position is bonus.
